Even a Sky presenter thinks Johnson hiding from Channel 4 is ‘pathetic’

On 1 October, Boris Johnson avoided an interview with Channel 4 while speaking to a number of other media outlets. This may have been because Channel 4 actually does its job and consistently holds the Conservative Party to account. But even a presenter at corporate giant Sky thought Johnson’s move was “pathetic”.
Fleeing from scrutiny
The Channel 4 team publicly criticised Johnson for hiding from their questions:
Democracy is weakened by a lack of media plurality. Instead we have to ask others his thoughts & despite days covering his every movement not be granted the chance to ask him questions directly. At a crucial time in the UK’s history political leaders have got to stop being #frit
— Ben de Pear (@bendepear) October 1, 2019
Read on...
Sad and mystified that Boris Johnson is not being allowed onto @Channel4News today. Our many viewers would like to see him explain his Brexit and other plans and see him scrutinised by us. He’s a grown up. He can take serious questions. It is a missed opportunity for him.
— Krishnan Guru-Murthy (@krishgm) October 1, 2019
"It's above my pay grade."
Boris Johnson responds to why he won't be speaking to Channel 4 News today, despite agreeing to interviews with other major broadcasters. pic.twitter.com/hnu7cqztKk
— Channel 4 News (@Channel4News) October 1, 2019
And it seemed that Johnson’s move was even too much for right-wing Sky presenter Adam Boulton, who called it a:
Pathetic boycott of a national news broadcaster. https://t.co/ToLXTsUGbT
— Adam Boulton (@adamboultonSKY) October 1, 2019
What was Johnson scared of?
A journalist recently accused Johnson of sexual misconduct. The PM has denied the allegations, though, with supporters claiming these were ‘private matters’.
In reality, as many have pointed out:
.@BBCr4today claims allegations are about Boris Johnson’s 'private life'.
This is wrong and offensive. She was a young journalist. He was editor. It was a work lunch.
Downplaying sexual harassment allegations as ‘private’ has been used to silence women for centuries.
— Labour Press Team (@labourpress) September 30, 2019
And Channel 4 News anchor Krishnan Guru-Murthy took the same position, saying:
Dear colleagues. Please stop calling allegations about groping “private life”. It isn’t private life. Having affairs can be said to be private life. Groping is about public conduct, respect for women and is potentially criminal.
— Krishnan Guru-Murthy (@krishgm) October 1, 2019
Could this be why Johnson wanted to avoid Channel 4 scrutiny?
Or could it possibly be because Channel 4 has vocally called out the Conservatives’ Islamophobia crisis?
In July, Channel 4 revealed statistics suggesting endemic Islamophobia in the party, with 56% of its members agreeing that “Islam is a threat to the British way of life”. It also reported finding numerous Islamophobic posts online from apparent members. This wasn’t exactly news to the Muslim community, which had consistently called for official inquiries into Tory Islamophobia. But now, we have a Conservative prime minister who has faced much criticism for his own Islamophobic comments, and who has team members with alleged links with anti-Muslim organisations. So this is probably the kind of scrutiny Johnson could do without, especially with a racism row currently blowing up at conference.
The Tory conference Islamophobia scandal
On 30 September, the president of the National Union of Students (NUS) pulled out of the Conservatives’ conference, claiming that it “openly denies the existence of Islamophobia”:
I came to Manchester for #CPC19. I had every intention of proudly representing millions of students across our country. However, as President of @nusuk and a Muslim woman I cannot in good conscience participate in a Conference that openly denies the existence of Islamophobia.
— Zamzam Ibrahim (@ZamzamMCR) September 30, 2019
At a time when far-right groups are on the rise, with Islamophobia at the centre of their hateful agenda, she said:
You can't deny my own lived experiences, and the racism faced by Muslims from the far-right, parts of our media and in communities across our country daily. You can't hide from this deep and horrific problem. For this reason I have withdrawn from all engagements at #CPC19.
— Zamzam Ibrahim (@ZamzamMCR) September 30, 2019
Criticism came from within the Conservative Party, too. As Business Insider reported, former Tory chair Sayeeda Warsi said she was “truly ashamed” of her party. Why? Because a conference “panel discussion” saw attendees “defend comments made by Boris Johnson about Muslim women, while panelists called for the term Islamophobia to be scrapped”.
Speaking of the meeting in question, Warsi stressed:
“Sunday’s meeting was disingenuous, divisive and peppered with dog whistles. Maybe it’s time to acknowledge that it was very suited to today’s Tory party” my opinion piece on #CPC2019 #Islamophobia https://t.co/FiVEGtcXs8
— Sayeeda Warsi (@SayeedaWarsi) September 30, 2019
She also said she was “sick to my stomach” that “British Muslims have become a convenient scapegoat for populism, a butt of insulting language to increase poll ratings & an event on Islamophobia is an opportunity to demonise Muslims”. And she called on establishment media outlets to “wake up” to this, asking:
At what point r @BBCNews @SkyNews @AndrewMarr9 @Peston @bbclaurak @BBCr4today & others going 2wake up?
Investigate the panelist’s, the hosts, their history on Islamophobia- have any ever defended British Muslims?
When the”respectable” rationalise racism we are in serious trouble https://t.co/0spUKhwPwP— Sayeeda Warsi (@SayeedaWarsi) September 29, 2019
She then gave a powerful answer to an ill-thought-out Twitter question from her party:
What more could you ask for?
I’m asking you to stop being racist
To stop demonising muslims
And to have an Independent Inquiry into #Islamophobia as promised by the PM on national TV 👍🏼#CPC19 #CPC2019 https://t.co/jUpCdOiR66— Sayeeda Warsi (@SayeedaWarsi) September 30, 2019
Don’t let Team Johnson off the hook
By shunning a Channel 4 interview, Johnson showed how keen he is to avoid meaningful scrutiny. But we mustn’t let him. We must use every opportunity possible to hold him and his colleagues to account for their elitism, sexism, and racism.
Britain deserves so much better. And we need to demand better.
Featured image via Twitter – Channel 4
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?
-
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
This is what Johnson is up to:
Today he puts his “final offer” to the EU. The idea of that is to close down on the possibility of them offering an extension: there will be no point as there will be no further discussions.
He knows they will turn down today’s offer. He will put the no-deal option to parliament and it will be defeated. He will then refuse to send the letter required by the Benn Act. There will a court application and the ruling will be that the government must send the letter. The Cabinet Sec or someone similar will be ordered to sign it.
His assumption is the EU will turn down the request. Thus the government will have complied with the law and we will leave the EU on 31st without an arrangement.
The flaws are: a) the EU may call his bluff and agree to an extension, in which case he is finished; b) the anti no-deal collaborative will agree on a temporary PM and hold the vote of no confidence, in which case he is finished.
It’s high stakes, but that’s his game.