A devastating new deal
According to Unison, most of the strikers earn £16-18,000 a year, which is well below the current UK median salary of £27,600. But the Labour-controlled council is planning to sack them on New Year’s Eve and re-employ them the very next day on far worse contracts.
A Unison official close to the dispute told The Canary that it was “extremely rare” for a Labour-controlled council to threaten to sack its own staff in pay disputes.
The official said:
The dismissals are due to take effect on New Year’s Eve with them being immediately reengaged on 1 January. Not a pleasant start to the New Year for them.
Teaching assistants fight back
But the women, who are Unison members, have refused to be cowed by the council’s tactics. This week’s action follows a strike earlier this month and a high profile campaign, which has met with Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell and Shadow Education Secretary Angela Rayner.
Caroline Neill, a Durham teaching assistant, told The Canary that the council’s actions were insulting to loyal staff, who regularly work over their contracted hours:
It’s a kick in the teeth after doing a job for eight years. It’s insulting and it’s disheartening.
She said she wouldn’t be able to afford to replace her ageing car or go on holiday if the council succeeded. And she said another teaching assistant was so afraid of the new contract that she had sold her home and moved in with her parents.
The mood among the strikers fluctuates, but they say they feel strong when they stand together on the picket line. Neill said:
There are times when we feel very alone and very scared. But then there are times when we feel extremely powerful and extremely united. We draw this energy from each other and we feel like we are going to fight to the end.
The strike will affect more than 100 primary schools across County Durham. Lively picket lines will probably close some of them completely. And that’s not all. From Friday 25 November until the end of term, teaching assistants will only work to rule.
Unison General Secretary Dave Prentis has branded the council’s plans “heartless”, saying:
Teaching assistants hate the idea of inconveniencing parents but this is now the only way for school support workers to win the pay they deserve.
The council, however, argues that it has no choice. Jane Brown, Durham’s cabinet member for corporate services, argued that the teaching assistants’ existing contracts were “morally and legally not right”.
Teaching assistants were getting paid for more hours than they worked and were getting approximately six weeks’ holiday more than the rest of our staff.
She also claimed the council would face multi-million pound claims if it did not act.
I think there’s a lot of misinformation. The main one [is that] this is a cost cutting exercise. It absolutely isn’t. Durham County Council do not benefit financially. We do not pay the teaching assistants. The schools pay the teaching assistants. This is about the equal pay claim risk, which potentially could cost the council millions and millions of pounds.
Unison disagrees. It says it offered the council various ways to avoid such equal pay claims, but it didn’t take them up in talks.
Neill, meanwhile, believes the council doesn’t understand how hard she and her colleagues work.
We may not work during the holidays, but when we are at work we work above and beyond the hours we have been contracted to work. I’d love to be paid for the hours I work!
The teaching assistants are already low-paid, and fear more cuts would devastate them. That’s why their struggle continues.
– Tweet your support to: @TAs_Durham.
– Like their Facebook page and keep up to date with the strike here
Featured image via Durham Teaching Assistants #ValueUs campaign
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?