Tube worker sacked after trying to help a pregnant woman who was being ‘assaulted’

Steve Topple

A tube worker has been sacked by London Underground Limited (LUL) for allegedly going to help a pregnant colleague who was being ‘assaulted’ by a ‘fare evader’.

An obvious assault?

On 16 November 2016, Kirsty Watts, who was five months pregnant at the time, was allegedly pushed in the stomach by a fare evader. The incident happened at the northern gate of London Bridge tube station. She radioed for help, and the message was picked up by Lee Cornell, a Customer Service Assistant at London Bridge.

The National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers (RMT) claims that, when Cornell arrived at the scene, the assailant:

punched Lee twice and stole his glasses. Lee reacted to get his property back and prevent a further assault on him. He pushed him into a wall and when he got his property back he walked away. The fare evader continued to try and fight any other LUL staff who came near him. He even tried to head butt Lee Cornell again. Lee never reacted. He once again walked away.

Two other LUL staff have also allegedly been “sanctioned” by the company. And Cornell has been summarily dismissed (that is, without investigation or notice) over the incident. The RMT claims the reason LUL gave was because Cornell “lost control”.

Dirty tricks?

But RMT claims that LUL is being “entirely duplicitous” and running a “dirty tricks” campaign against Cornell and Watts. It says that:

  • The manager who originally interviewed Watts accepted she had been assaulted.
  • An Electronic Incident Reporting Form (EIRF) states Watts was assaulted.
  • Watts submitted statements to three company disciplinary panels (CDI) that she had been assaulted. All three panels agreed.

The RMT is balloting members for strike action over Cornell’s dismissal.

Just who do they work for?

LUL is a subsidiary of Transport for London (TfL).

Phil O’Hare, General Manager for the Jubilee line, told The Canary:

Following an appeal process the decision to dismiss this member of staff was upheld. Our investigation into this incident included reviewing extensive CCTV footage. We are satisfied that his conduct on that day was not in line with the standards we expect from our staff. We take a zero tolerance approach to violence against our staff but similarly expect our employees to adhere to acceptable standards of conduct and behaviour when dealing with members of the public.

If what the RMT is saying is true, it raises serious questions about who LUL, and TfL, actually represent. Workers on the tube are there to help and protect London’s millions of commuters. But this shouldn’t mean that they are subject to abuse and violence. Nor should it mean that their employers treat them so appallingly.

Get Involved!

Support The Canary so we can keep bringing you the news that matters.

Featured image via RMT London Calling

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed