Labour’s new DWP pledge is only a half measure

Jeremy Corbyn and the DWP logo
Steve Topple

Labour has clarified its position over a contentious Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) policy. But when you check it, it really doesn’t go far enough; potentially leaving millions of people worse off than they should be.

The DWP: freezing all over

In April 2016, the government brought in the benefits freeze. This meant the DWP would not increase the amount paid for some working age benefits until April 2020. It followed a cap on increases at 1% from April 2013. The benefits affected are:

  • Jobseeker’s Allowance (JSA).
  • Child Benefit.
  • Housing Benefit.
  • Tax credits.
  • Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) Work-Related Activity Group.
  • Universal Credit (not disability elements).

The government said the freeze would save it £3.9bn a year. But now, Labour has moved on the policy.

Labour making moves

As Mirror journalist Dan Bloom tweeted, Labour’s position on the benefits freeze was unclear:

But then, shadow chancellor John McDonnell appeared to confirm that Labour would stop the benefits freeze. Apparently, it would commit to increasing the benefits hit by the freeze in line with inflation:

Any move from Labour to make claimants’ lives better should be welcomed, but not uncritically. Because the problem with the pledge is it doesn’t go nearly far enough.

Not good enough

As The Canary previously reported, the think tank the Resolution Foundation crunched the numbers around the benefits freeze.  It found that overall, claimants have experienced a 6.4% real terms cut to their money (adjusted for inflation).

The Resolution Foundation also found that in real terms:

  • Overall Child Benefit is worth less than in 1999.
  • JSA is now lower than in 1991.
  • Child Benefit for two or more children is worth less than in 1979:

Benefits adjusted for inflation

But even more staggering was its analysis of benefits as a share of average earnings. These figures show that unemployment benefits and Child Benefit for two or more children are at 70-year lows by this measure:

Benefits as a share of average earnings

Overall, by 2019/20 the freeze will have wiped £4.4bn off affected families’ incomes.

Your move, Labour

But moreover, Labour pledging to end the freeze and uprate benefits is basically what the Conservatives appear to be thinking of doing – possibly. As the Resolution Foundation said:

there is also a tough question for the opposition parties. Labour, the SNP and the Liberal Democrats have all said they would end the freeze. But CPI uprating is already set to return from April 2020. The big question now is whether those parties would actually undo the real term cuts that have already happened… if they got the chance, or if that £4.4 billion, 6 per cent cut will simply be accepted as a ‘fait accompli’.

Labour should be saying ‘No. We won’t accept families losing £4.4bn’. But will it? If people start demanding it, maybe the party will listen.

Get Involved!

– Read more from The Canary on the DWP.

– Support the website Universal Credit Sufferer.

Featured image via Owen Jones – YouTube and UK government – Wikimedia 

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed