Nicola Sturgeon calls out a Tory MSP for her ‘appalling’ and ‘ignorant’ DWP comments

Nicola Sturgeon in Holyrood
Brian Finlay

During Scottish First Ministers Questions (FMQs) on 25 October, Nicola Sturgeon called out Conservative MSP Michelle Ballantyne. She did so after Ballantyne made “Dickensian” comments in the Scottish Parliament during a debate on “ending austerity, poverty and inequality” on 24 October.

‘Appalling’ DWP comments

Ballantyne said during the debate:

It is fair that people on benefits cannot have as many children as they like while people who work and pay their way and do not claim benefits have to make decisions about the number of children they can have. Fairness means fairness to everybody, not to one part of the community.

She was subsequently roasted by SNP MSP for Renfrewshire South Tom Arthur for her “disgraceful” comments. Sturgeon then took the opportunity to call out Ballantyne’s comments after Arthur asked her the following question at FMQs:

Can I ask the first minister for her response to comments made in this chamber yesterday that people reliant upon social security, including those receiving in-work benefits, have no right to have more than two children?

Sturgeon said Ballantyne’s comments were “appalling” and “also ignorant”:

Meanwhile, the Conservative MSP was sat in the chamber like this as the first minister spoke about the comments she had made:

Michelle Ballantyne in Holyrood

A picture paints a thousand words.

‘Dismantling that social security safety net’

Sturgeon continued to slam Conservative welfare reforms:

[The comments were] appalling because the idea that being poor should be a barrier to having a family is Dickensian, and I think shows the Scottish Conservatives in their true colours.

Sturgeon also clarified why Ballantyne’s comments were “ignorant”. She said that, from 2019, the rape clause – an exemption from the two-child limit for tax credits for dependants born from “non-consensual conception” – will no longer just apply to newborn children. It will apply to anyone with children who has to claim benefits. This will include families with more than two children if their “circumstances change”.

Sturgeon concluded:

The social security safety net is there for all of us, should we need it in times of distress or times of changed circumstances, and frankly shame on the Conservatives that they are dismantling that social security safety net.

Twitter reaction

But Ballantyne’s comments have raised some eyebrows far beyond the chamber in Holyrood. One voter claimed this is the “ideology of the Tory party”:

The Political Editor of ITV Border, Peter MacMahon, also shared Sturgeon’s comments on Twitter:

Meanwhile, Arthur called on Ballantyne to resign:

He also called out Conservative MP Paul Masterton, who selected Ballantyne to speak at a Universal Credit event:

One voter showed their disgust at Ballantyne’s hypocrisy:

It’s unlikely that Ballantyne will resign from the frontbench. But her “disgraceful” comments have exposed her personal views towards benefits. And they reflect very badly on the Scottish Conservatives.

This rhetoric has no place in our politics.

Get Involved!

– Join us, so we can keep bringing you the news that matters.

Featured image via: Scottish Parliament/YouTube

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed

Brian Finlay