The BBC’s political editor spectacularly fails to grasp the concept of Prime Minister’s Questions

Theresa May, Laura Kuenssberg and Jeremy Corbyn
Emily Apple

Pretty much every week when parliament is sitting, Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) takes place. The concept is a simple one and the clue is in the name. And in case that’s not enough, parliament’s website gives a helpful description:

Prime Minister’s Question Time, also referred to as PMQs, gives MPs the chance to question the Prime Minister.

But somehow, the BBC‘s political editor Laura Kuenssberg spectacularly failed to grasp the concept. Following an exchange between Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn that ended with May asking Corbyn a question, Kuenssberg tweeted:

Sorry, what?

Luckily, social media users were on hand to remind Kuenssberg how PMQs works:

And just in case there was any doubt:

Although, as others pointed out, it can be a little confusing given May very rarely actually answers a direct question:

Others couldn’t quite believe it was the BBC‘s political editor making the comment:

Wishful thinking…

Some people wondered if they’d missed a general election:

But last time The Canary checked, there wasn’t an overnight snap general election. And as Twitter users highlighted, Kuenssberg’s framing is important given May’s lack of answers:

Even more wishful thinking…

It would be nice to have a political system where the apparent leader of the country was questioned each week and responded with coherent and accountable answers. It would also be nice for this occur without the event turning into what shadow education secretary Angel Rayner described as a “pantomime”.

But this isn’t the case. And between May’s refusal to answer questions, the behaviour of her MPs, and this kind of response from media pundits, it’s obvious why so many people are fed up with mainstream establishment politics.

Get Involved!

Support The Canary if you appreciate the work we do.

Featured image via screengrab and screengrab

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed

Emily Apple