The election choice is simple – it’s either Robin Hood or the Sheriff of Nottingham

Labour’s policies, as outlined in its 2019 general election manifesto, are truly transformative. And if Labour is elected to power the UK will see a semblance of socialism, together with a glimpse into what a society based on co-operation can be like.
A simple choice
To achieve that degree of change, we need a revolution. But given the right circumstances, that can be achieved via the ballot box.
For it’s now very clear: you can vote for the Sheriff of Nottingham (Boris Johnson) and his equally privileged sidekick Guy of Gisbourne (Dominic Cummings).
Or you can vote for Robin Hood.
Hope
As Jeremy Corbyn makes clear, Labour’s plan, as outlined in its manifesto, is about hope:
Read on...
A radical change
In the foreword to the manifesto Corbyn outlines his vision:
This election will shape our country for a generation. It is your opportunity to transform our country, so that it works not just for a few, but for all of us. …
It’s time to take on the vested interests holding people back. The last decade has seen a wealth grab by a privileged few, supported by the Conservatives, at the expense of the majority. The big polluters, financial speculators and corporate tax-dodgers have had a free ride for too long.
Labour will build a fairer Britain that cares for all, where wealth and power are shared.
Meanwhile, although poverty in the UK is at critical levels, Corbyn says:
I am not prepared to continue to see more families without a proper home and more people queuing at food banks or sleeping rough on the streets.
I am not prepared to put up with communities blighted by lack of investment, endless cuts to vital services and millions struggling to make ends meet, while tax cuts are handed to the richest.
We can do better than this. How can it be right that in the fifth richest country in the world, people’s living standards are going backwards and life expectancy is stalling?
So how will change happen?
Corbyn goes on to explain how Labour will change our society for the better.
For example, Labour will launch the “largest-scale investment programme in modern times” to fund the jobs and industries of the future. It will also launch what it calls a Green Industrial Revolution, to tackle the climate emergency. It will do this by “shifting to renewable energy, investing in rail and electric cars, and making housing energy- efficient”. In addition, Labour will bring back rail, mail, water and energy into public ownership, to end what it calls the great privatisation rip-off. Full-fibre broadband will also be free to everyone across the UK.
Furthermore, the Living Wage will increase to £10 an hour, zero-hour contracts will be abolished and Labour will end the need for foodbanks.
But that’s not all
Labour also pledges to create a National Education Service: “from Sure Start centres to top-quality early years education; well-funded schools with lower class sizes to free university tuition with no fees, and free lifelong learning”. Furthermore, Labour will guarantee the NHS receives all the funding it needs, end NHS privatisation and ensure prescriptions and basic dentistry are free for all. Similarly, all personal care for older people will be free.
And everything in the manifesto is fully costed. Moreover, 163 leading economists have given their full backing to Labour’s ambitious plans.
Taking from the very rich and giving to the poor
These policies will help restore our faith in ourselves as we rediscover that life need not be a day-to-day struggle. In simple terms, a Labour government means that an average family will save £6,700 per year from reduced bills alone:
Labour will save an average family £6,700
🔥£559 on energy bills
💧£113 on water bills
💻£364 on broadband
🚆£2,194 on a pair of season rail tickets
👶£2,941 for childcare per child
💊£108 a year for a monthly prescription
🍽£437 on free school meals
👛That's a total of £6,719 pic.twitter.com/c9eVf47IDN— The Labour Party (@UKLabour) December 4, 2019
And that’s not taking into account that there will be no tax rises unless a person earns more than £80,000 a year.
The B-word
Labour’s solution to the Brexit divide is to seek a deal that would be put to the people in a confirmatory vote (with an option to leave). The deal would include a UK-wide customs union; alignment with the single market; protection of workers’ rights, consumer rights, and environmental protections. It also means continued participation in EU research, education and funding programmes, alongside a commitment to ongoing security arrangements.
And that means Labour’s version of Brexit:
protects jobs, rights and the environment, avoids a hard border in Northern Ireland and protects the Good Friday Agreement and the peace process.
Corbyn told a BBC audience that he wants to bring the nation together over Brexit, and that:
I will adopt, as Prime Minister if I am at the time, a neutral stance so I can credibly carry out the results of that to bring our communities and country together, rather than continuing an endless debate about the EU and Brexit.
In contrast
Boris Johnson’s version of Brexit can only be described as a complete con. For his flawed ‘deal’ will likely see not just months but years of further negotiations over trade. Or he will opt for a disastrous no-deal if those negotiations fail.
As for the Conservative manifesto, it fails in a number of key areas. For example, new nurses will get a maintenance grant and all students’ tuition fees will likely be frozen. Yet, in contrast, Labour will abolish tuition fees and bring back maintenance grants for all students and nurses will receive a bursary. Under the Tories, the dreaded Universal Credit will also stay, while Labour will scrap it.
Also, Johnson has promised tax cuts, but they are only for the richest people and corporations. That’s not that surprising, given that under the Tories working people in the UK are still regarded as serfs by a billionaire and oligarch-backed elite.
A stark choice
All in all, Johnson’s offerings would likely result in a Brexit-ruined economy and more years of austerity. Or you can help ensure he becomes one of the shortest-lived prime ministers in British history.
So, it’s either the Sheriff of Nottingham or Robin Hood.
And if it’s the latter, then Christmas will have come early.
Featured image via Youtube / Wikipedia – Sophie Brown
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
-
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
I must admit that when a child I rooted for the Sheriff of Nottingham, a far more interesting character than Hood.
Things have changed in Sherwood. Hood has developed constructive purpose rather than wishy washy taking from the undeserving rich and giving to the irredeemably hopeless poor; the wealth he appropriates is used to better the lot of all but with emphasis on those behind.
The modern Sheriff exudes such charm as arises from dousing a rapidly rotting corpse with the most expensive Parisian perfumes: intellectually wanting, spiritually dead, emotionally dead, morally moribund, yet the rotten carcass smells nice on superficial acquaintance.
Unfortunately that perfume-squirted corpse appeal – aristocratic speech – still holds sway in Britain. Curiously hypnotic it seems. If only he was forced to wear some kind of vocal strap-on for elections – something to give him a regional dialect or the voice of Microsoft Sam. All politicians could do this. Or just have us vote double-blind on policy without knowing the party… He wouldn’t stand a chance.
Something for the future perhaps. But then we’ll have to find a use for all these corpses in Parisian perfume
Labours ‘Rob the Rich and give to the Poor’ approach unfortunately causes the rich to leave the country for less taxes elsewhere. They can afford to go anywhere, they’re rich after all and have no loyalty to any particular nation or place of birth. Also business’s will pull out, again no particular loyalty to any one nation only the money in their pocket. Which leaves nothing but the poor. What then happens when the money runs out?