Group backed by Rachel Riley exploits veteran to spread smears about Jeremy Corbyn

Jeremy Corbyn
Tracy Keeling

A group called Mainstream UK has exploited a veteran to spread vicious smears against Jeremy Corbyn. The group, which has attracted support from serial Corbyn critic Rachel Riley and a number of disgruntled ex-Labour MPs, paid to spread a video around Facebook about the Labour leader on 7 December.

Mainstream UK brands itself as a non-partisan champion of “respectable and responsible politics”. But it has spent thousands of pounds on advertisements that only attack the Labour Party, showing zero respect to the public, and a total lack of responsibility itself by not being upfront with people about its apparent partisan aims.

IRA attack

In the video, “former Irish guard” John Radley shares his opinion of the Labour leader. When Radley was a 21-year-old lance corporal in the guards, he was severely injured and almost killed by an IRA nail bomb. Speaking in 2013 about someone convicted of involvement in the attack, Radley said:

Start your day with The Canary News Digest

Fresh and fearless; get excellent independent journalism from The Canary, delivered straight to your inbox every morning.




I lost my whole way of life, I lost my career, my whole life was ruined by this man.

The 1981 Chelsea Barracks IRA bomb killed two people and injured forty others.

In search of peace

Radley does not appear to have a high opinion of Corbyn. In Mainstream UK’s video, he brands the Labour leader a “supporter” of the IRA and “anti-British”.

Given Radley’s trauma at the hands of the IRA, it’s perhaps understandable that he holds this opinion. Because Corbyn was an MP who openly encouraged dialogue with members of the Republican party Sinn Féin in order to bring about peace in the north of Ireland. Indeed, Corbyn has regularly promoted dialogue to help peace processes, including with groups in the Middle East, such as Hamas – the elected government of Gaza that Western powers have designated a terrorist group. Radley also criticised Corbyn for this in the video.

Margaret Thatcher’s Conservative government, meanwhile, held negotiations with the IRA directly. These communications happened in secret and didn’t come to light until 2011. Thatcher has never been subject to the same ‘terrorist sympathiser’ accusations as the current Labour leader.

Dialogue is key

Corbyn has regularly had to defend his actions on the north of Ireland since becoming Labour leader. In 2017, for example, he said:

I was talking to representatives of the Republican movement… You have to bring about a peace process by talking to people that you don’t agree with. If you just talk amongst your friends, you’re not going to get a peace process

This is an argument he has made consistently. Amid outrage over his decision to host a press conference with Sinn Féin leader Gerry Adams in parliament in the 1990s, Corbyn stated:

Sinn Féin, whatever one thinks of them, are a major player in Irish politics. … [inviting Adams] doesn’t mean I agree with everything that he’s done or said… what I’m giving is an opportunity for a discussion with him and those people that disagree with him, why don’t they come along and… argue with him if they will, but at least get the process going.

We need peace in Ireland. Peace in Ireland involves all parties.

When Tony Blair became Labour leader in 1997, he then prioritised negotiating with Sinn Féin, organising face-to-face talks within months of taking office. That engagement concluded in the Good Friday Agreement, a widely celebrated peace deal.

Immediately after all parties reached that agreement, Blair declared “the hand of history is on our shoulders”. Like Thatcher, he hasn’t gone down in British history as a ‘terrorist sympathiser’ for his role in the north of Ireland either.

“A dark and menacing prop”

In short, of the many British leaders who engaged with Sinn Féin and the IRA to bring about peace, only Corbyn faces derision for it. As Belfast-based writer Siobhan Fenton said in 2017 when attacks against Corbyn were in full swing once again:

For the English, Northern Irish people and our trauma are produced like a dark and menacing prop in elections for a bit of excitement. Then we are set aside, with none of our concerns or issues actually addressed, once the English news cycle has moved on. I imagine few in England understand how insulting that is to Northern Irish people, or how damaging to our peace process, but I imagine fewer still will care.

Fenton is right. The anti-Corbyn media regularly use the Northern Irish people as a “prop” for their attacks on the Labour leader. Now Mainstream UK is using Radley, and his very real trauma, in exactly the same way.

But the biased media and groups who use these affected parties to cynically attack Corbyn for his role in encouraging the peace process are effectively arguing against that peace itself. A peace that successfully did bring an end to the majority of the violence in the north of Ireland and Great Britain and that leaders of many stripes supported.

That’s how far they’ll go in order to ‘get’ their man.

Featured image via YouTube – Guardian News

Since you're here ...

We know you don't need a lecture. You wouldn't be here if you didn't care.
Now, more than ever, we need your help to challenge the rightwing press and hold power to account. Please help us survive and thrive.

The Canary Support
  • Show Comments
    1. The British state did terrible things to Ireland (Ireland belongs to the Irish) and a soldier who suffered in The Troubles blames a man who tried to negotiate peace with both sides, but he forgets, you can’t negotiate peace with just one side; heck, you can’t even negotiate surrender with just one side. Then that discontent is used by a woman who supports a country doing the exact same thing to Palestine (and Palestine belongs to the Palestinians).

      Likes her wars and aggression does this wretched woman, who must berate someone who seeks peace, forgetting it’s because of supporters like her the world’s on fucking fire.

    2. If Corbyn is attacked for meeting the IRA he can surely explain that he has met the Conservative leaders and they have killed more people than the IRA ever did. If he is accused of calling the Conservatives terrorists he could say, “No, they are more like the Nazis”

    3. What stuns me is that all of these lies are clearly ‘Defamation of Character’, which is a criminal, jailable, fine-able offence, due to the sheer level of harm such claims can do to an individual and more.

      Arguably though, these attacks are of a highly dangerous and criminal nature as they are damaging the very fabric of our Democracy and Country, misleading millions of people. Those who engage in such lies should be treated as the criminals they are, namely stripped of power, ignored, vilified and most importantly, jailing the fuckers so that their criminal words may be silenced as they truly deserve to be.

      It is not acceptable for politicians or anyone to break the law by bearing false witness, which is what defamation of character and libel are. Why are these people NOT being arrested, prosecuted and jailed for their evil crimes against Queen and Country. Those, who like Rachel Riley, spread falsehoods and lies with impunity MUST be brought to justice, and I very much hope that if Jeremy Corbyn gets Labour in, he will start a process to see that ALL of those who have committed these treasonous and criminal acts be publicly arrested, their crimes made manifest to the World, and be jailed for life.

      Bearing false witness, Defaming someone’s character, and committing libellous acts are NOT just something we should put up with, and the perpetrators should be prosecuted as the Law already says they should. The fact that this is not occurring on the scale it should be, is a sign that even our legal system is complicit in allowing this to continue.

      The Law and the Officers of the Law need to do their fucking jobs properly, or dismiss themselves from service as unfit for purpose, or even arrest themselves for their failure to uphold law, and protecting the Citizens and Democracy they are supposed to.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.