On the NHS’s 69th birthday, Jeremy Hunt’s stealth privatisation plans for it have just started unravelling

Jeremy Hunt NHS Privatisation
Support us and go ad-free

On Wednesday 5 July, the NHS celebrated its 69th birthday. But the ongoing crisis in it and alleged “stealth privatisation” by the Conservatives may have just been dealt a blow. And it comes from an unlikely source.

Clear direction?

The Local Government Association (LGA) began its annual conference on Tuesday 4 July. And among the topics debated were Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt, the Department of Health (DoH), and NHS England’s “Sustainability and Transformation Plans” (STP). NHS England says the plans are to:

help ensure that health and care services are built around the needs of local populations. To do this, every health and care system in England will produce… STP… ultimately delivering the Five Year Forward View

To deliver plans that are based on the needs of local populations, local health and care systems… [have] formed 44 STP ‘footprints’… [to] drive genuine and sustainable transformation in patient experience and health outcomes of the longer-term.

As The Canary previously reported, the Five Year Forward View is designed to “set out a clear direction for the NHS – showing why change is needed and what it will look like”. Its mission is to “integrate health and care services across the country”. But critics argue that the View is a “wish list for privateers“, and will result in the NHS being sold off to private companies. And now, a survey by the LGA has revealed that the majority of local authorities are critical of STPs.

Councils up in arms

The LGA says that:

  • Less than 25% of councils think STPs will deliver or bring benefits to local communities.
  • 90% said that the government was driving the plans, not local authorities.
  • 80% of councillors thought STPs were “not fit for purpose”; and “prioritised cost-cutting and closing hospitals over preventing illness”.

Councillors called STPs “secretive and opaque”; “complex and full of jargon”; “top down, secretive, [with a] lack of engagement”; and said that “the NHS simply does not understand the decision-making of local government”. But the LGA criticisms are nothing new, as campaigners have been arguing against STPs since NHS England first announced the plans.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

“Super Trusts”

Every Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) responsible for NHS services and contracts had to submit an STP by 21 October 2016. These outlined how they will speed up achieving the Five Year Forward View; but also how they’ll wipe out any budget deficits they have. The deficits in the NHS have ballooned since 2010:


It also seems that hospitals and health centres will lose financial responsibility to the 44 Footprint areas. NHS England’s Planning Guidance for the next two financial years brings in mandatory ‘control totals’, or financial targets, for STP Footprint areas. In essence, this will take away financial control from individual hospitals.

But the STP Footprint plans run deeper than this. Simon Stevens, Chief Executive of NHS England, has said that he’d like the 44 Footprint areas to become ‘combined authorities’, bringing together NHS service commissioners and care providers. Ultimately, this would eradicate local NHS decision making, and hand power to executives in distant boardrooms – NHS England and the DoH.

The “endgame” for the NHS?

Campaign group Call 999 for the NHS told The Canary:

In short STP are key to cuts, privatisation, and central control over the NHS and social care… The government [is already committed to] encouraging long term NHS partnerships with the private sector in key areas.

These plans are explicitly an opportunity for increased privatisation and will rapidly set up NHS England’s Five Year Forward View initiatives like new care models and new organisational forms. This will lead to a health and social care service modelled along American private health company lines.

The Five Year Forward View and the STP that NHS England has imposed… is effectively the endgame for the NHS as a comprehensive health service that is free at the point of use and based on a patient’s clinical need.

Hollow words?

The LGA survey is significant because of the outrage over STP. But its comments should also be approached with caution as, at its annual conference, it debated the benefits of public-private partnerships in the public sector. Also, the LGA has merely said that it wishes its members to be “equal partners in STPs”. It hasn’t objected to them outright. It would seem that, as local government’s response to the stealth privatisation of our NHS is muted criticism, it’s down to campaigners, NHS staff and patients to continue to fight for the future of our health service.

Get Involved!

– Read more Canary articles on Health, and the NHS.

– You can also take action with Keep Our NHS Public.

– And furthermore support us if you appreciate the work we do.

Featured image via YouTube

Support us and go ad-free

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop


The Canary Fund us

Comments are closed