The British establishment prefers to condemn fake killings of journalists rather than real ones

Image of glasses on top of a newspaper
Support us and go ad-free

The British political establishment seems to prefer talking about fake killings of journalists rather than real ones. And its reactions seem to depend on where the killings happen.

These double standards are unacceptable.

Russia

On 29 May 2018, the BBC – among various other news outlets – falsely reported that Russian journalist Arkady Babchenko had been murdered near his home in Kiev, Ukraine. The article added that Babchenko is “an outspoken critic of the Kremlin”, suggesting a causal link between his ‘murder’ and his journalism. Later that same week, Babchenko told media outlets that his death had been staged.

Boris Johnson, then-UK foreign secretary, had already tweeted the following:

And Johnson’s refusal to delete the tweet (still up as of 2 August) oddly suggests that he remains “appalled” at Babchenko’s murder, despite it never happening.

But while fake killings of Russian journalists are immediately and widely criticised – even when they haven’t been murdered, very real killings in countries with governments allied to the UK attract little to no criticism.

In Colombia, for example, the already critical situation for journalists is deteriorating, yet it rarely attracts high-level condemnation or mainstream media coverage in Britain. The same is true of the situations in Mexico and Turkey.

Where’s the outrage over Colombia?

In 2016, Boris Johnson sent a tweet to then-Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos, within which he managed to misspell the country’s name (“Columbia”). But this appears to be one of the few times Johnson – or any other Tory MP for that matter – has ever spoken about Colombia. While there are 153 records of parliament speaking about journalists in Russia since 2010, there are just 11 mentions of the situation in Colombia.

But threats against Colombian journalists should not be dismissed. According to the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), two Colombian journalists have already been murdered this year – making a total of 51 since 1992.

On 23 July, meanwhile, a joint statement [pdf, Spanish] signed by the United Nations, the Organization of American States, and the European Union expressed concern over the rising number of threats against Colombian journalists. According to the Foundation for Press Freedom (FLIP), at least 124 journalists have been threatened in Colombia during 2018 – an increase of 48% on 2017.

In a recent case, a Twitter user told Semana magazine’s María Jimena Duzán that she should be “raped, spat upon, chopped up with a chainsaw and hung in the Plaza de Bolívar”. Duzán was just one of a number of journalists to receive such messages within a 72-hour period, beginning on 14 July 2018.

It is widely believed that the increase in threats is connected to the recent election of hard-right president Iván Duque.

The sound of selective silence

This year, the murder of two Colombian journalists has received less attention than the fake killing of one Russian journalist.

One journalist killing, of course, is too many. But the British media and political establishment’s outrage is not proportionate to the facts.

The impatience to condemn the ‘murder’ of a Russian journalist, coupled with the silence on journalist killings elsewhere, reveals a cynical game of posturing. When the murder of journalists can be used as a stick with which to beat non-allied states, the event is met with official outrage. When journalists are murdered within ‘friendly’ states with which Britain shares strong political and economic ties, the British state and media remain largely silent.

This relative silence regarding the killings of journalists is particularly concerning given the tacit support Britain and its allies often lend to those responsible. Boris Johnson is right that “we must defend freedom of speech”. But that principle should extend to friend and foe alike.

Get Involved!

– Join the British Colombia Solidarity Campaign.

– Support British-based NGO Justice for Colombia.

– Read more of The Canary’s reports on Colombia. And join us if you appreciate the work we do.

Featured image via Pxhere

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed