Chris Williamson is right about antisemitism. Right-wingers are gaslighting the Corbyn-led movement.

Chris Williamson
Avatar

Labour MP Chris Williamson has been suspended from Labour for saying that the party has been “too apologetic” over allegations of antisemitism. But although he later apologised for those words, Williamson has consistently made an important point. While the Labour leadership has correctly taken strong and swift action against proven cases of antisemitism, the leadership, and the wider ‘Labour left’, has conceded too much ground on the issue. It’s self-destructive to not acknowledge that right-wingers and supporters of Israel’s occupation are gaslighting the Jeremy Corbyn-led movement.

This is a major problem. The weaponisation of antisemitism from Corbyn’s political opponents has:

  • diluted the power of the word ‘antisemitism’, which undermines the struggle against racism both globally and on the UK ‘left’. This risks creating an environment in which antisemitic attacks are more, not less, likely.
  • damaged the political standing of the Corbyn-led movement.
“Disinformation paradigm”

Let’s not forget where the narrative on Labour and antisemitism began. The UK establishment threw all kinds of mud at Corbyn when he first emerged as a front-runner in the 2015 Labour leadership election. But the barrage of stories that Corbyn is secretly in cahoots with Vladimir Putin, has sold British secrets to communist spies or is “the left’s Enoch Powell” were too far-fetched. It was a combination of the legitimate cases of antisemitism in Labour plus the snowballing allegations from Corbyn’s political opponents that did it. The elite finally had something that stuck.

Start your day with The Canary News Digest

Fresh and fearless; get excellent independent journalism from The Canary, delivered straight to your inbox every morning.

The next step was to smear the whole Corbyn-led movement as ‘antisemitic’. The establishment and its media have tried to do this in two main ways. Firstly, they spotlight the actions of a small minority on the Labour fringe (accusations of antisemitism relate to 0.1% of the membership). And secondly, they publish exaggerated rhetoric from right-wingers. Indeed, an academic study from Goldsmiths shows that the mainstream media’s relentless coverage of Labour antisemitism greatly exaggerates the scale of the problem. Analysing coverage of Labour and antisemitism in summer 2018, the academics concluded:

Following extensive case study research, we identified myriad inaccuracies and distortions in online and television news including marked skews in sourcing, omission of essential context or right of reply, misquotation, and false assertions made either by journalists themselves or sources whose contentious claims were neither challenged nor countered. Overall, our findings were consistent with a disinformation paradigm.

Continue reading below...

Let’s do better

Yet the Labour leadership and many of its prominent supporters have never called out this “disinformation paradigm” on antisemitism. They seem to forget that only 32% of the UK public trusts “the media in general” and that the UK has the least trusted press in Europe by a distance. They seem not to fully register the fact that centrism is collapsing around the world and a smear campaign is all the ‘free-market’ establishment has left. The leadership and others apparently don’t realise that the elite is on the run and the Corbyn-led movement should be on the offensive. Instead, they apologise over allegations of antisemitism from political opponents, even when those claims are baseless. The latest example is Williamson, whom Labour has essentially suspended for criticising the party’s approach. The MP for Derby North: suspended for calling out the failure of the party to challenge the systematic smearing of its own membership and leader.

Israel’s weaponisation of antisemitism

The attacks do not just come from right-wing Labour figures like Chuka Umunna, who slander the party as “institutionally antisemitic”. Israel’s strategic affairs ministry has an outright “black ops” policy of smearing the Palestine solidarity movement. When it comes to the UK specifically, the Israeli government body has funded and coordinated the “Act.IL” propaganda initiative. This application deploys an online troll army that spreads false propaganda about Corbyn and Labour. This is because the Labour leader has long been strong on upholding Palestinian rights under international law and has a gold-standard record on antiracism.

What’s more, six of the nine Labour MPs who recently quit the party are supporters of the Labour Friends of Israel pressure group. In the Al Jazeera documentary The Lobby, a key Labour Friends of Israel officer admitted to an undercover reporter that it works “really closely” with the Israeli embassy “behind the scenes”. He continued:

It’s just publicly we just try to keep the LFI as a separate identity to the embassy.

These revelations should have been enough for the Labour leadership to call an inquiry into Labour Friends of Israel. But again, the Labour leadership continued in a futile attempt to appease people who only want to destroy its project. Now, a number of the pressure group’s key members have splintered from Labour and are launching yet more damaging attacks on the Corbyn-led movement. And, as ever, the corporate media is aiding and abetting them.

‘Disgraceful efforts to fend off the Corbyn threat’

Partly because of the Labour leadership’s weak response, we are now at the stage where 27% of the UK public think that Corbyn is an antisemite, according to a BMG poll in August 2018. In the words of renowned Jewish intellectual Noam Chomsky, this is a reversal of reality:

The charges of anti-Semitism against Corbyn are without merit, an underhanded contribution to the disgraceful efforts to fend off the threat that a political party might emerge that is led by an admirable and decent human being, a party that is actually committed to the interests and just demands of its popular constituency and the great majority of the population generally

And over 200 Jewish Labour supporters recently agreed:

We believe that the Labour party under the progressive leadership of Jeremy Corbyn is a crucial ally in the fight against bigotry and reaction. His lifetime record of campaigning for equality and human rights, including consistent support for initiatives against antisemitism, is formidable. His involvement strengthens this struggle.

To be clear, the struggle includes tackling antisemitism in Labour’s own ranks. For instance, the party rightly suspended Derek Hatton recently for holding Jewish people collectively responsible for the actions of Israel in a 2012 tweet. But often, the allegations against Corbyn and Labour rely heavily on misrepresentation.

So it’s crucial that the Labour leadership and many of its prominent supporters are stronger on calling out the bottom line: the media and right-wing storm over this is predominantly a smear campaign. Because it’s never going to stop until Corbyn either resigns or makes ever greater concessions on foreign policy, particularly on Palestinian rights.

Featured image via Twitter – BBC Newsnight

Since you're here ...

We know you don't need a lecture. You wouldn't be here if you didn't care.
Now, more than ever, we need your help to challenge the rightwing press and hold power to account. Please help us survive and thrive.

The Canary Support
  • Show Comments
    1. The weaponization of anti-Semitism will backfire and hurt the Jewish people in Britain by actually increasing anti-Semitism. It is giving fuel to the real anti-Semites who are saying “we told you so, the Jews are running politics and the Jewish Bankers want to prevent a Labour Government that will renationalise industries. Furthermore, the rise of a Corbyn government and the hope of its manifesto has derailed the right and prevented the ascendancy it has enjoyed in Europe. If these smears succeed and the labour party becomes unelectable this will open the floodgates to the right who harbour the mass of anti-Semites. But to be frank the Israeli Embassy sees itself in a win-win situation. Having promoted anti-Semitism around the world particularly in the Arab world, they have encouraged more Jews to emigrate to Israel.

    2. “”Hard-left? Hardly – point out a policy that is hard left please.”” DWPVictim

      “As for policies, upping corp tax which will not hit big MNCs that can reorganise to minimise tax is one, and will hit only UK businesses” Crawford_60

      Labour wants to return the corp tax to 26%, from the 19% it is now and from the 17% that the Tories are about to implement. 26% puts us around the middle of European corporate tax rates rather than near the bottom (although still the lowest in the G7). Hardly an extreme proposal (not hard-anything)

      “Also the idiotic slush-fund that will require companies to put up to 10% of their shares aside for employees without any merit”

      It’s only 1% per year over 10 years. Germany (that hotbed of hard-left policies) has something similar.

      “Also rescinding laws on trades unions, look at Birmingham to see what Britain would be like if that fat slug McCluskey and other union barons get free-rein from a Labour governmant.” Crawford_60

      Have you not been an employee over the last 15 years? Workers rights, have been diminished horribly. Employers are taking the piss and will not improve things unless they are forced to. History has shown the Unions to be the most effective way to do this.

      “Also the idiotic notion of a national investment bank, Just failed 1970s Industrial Policy by another name when failing businesses were nationalised. This would up borrowing which of itself is no bad thing but should be done with a benefit in sight.” Crawford_60

      I do not know enough about the ramifications of a NIBank to know if this is a good idea, but I suspect that neither do you. I have read that it would reduce the likelihood of another severe financial crash, that we are probably heading for, due to no real structural changes being made after the last one (despite structural problems being identified as a major cause and recommendations for changes).

      1. Mods – posted above comment in wrong place – was supposed to be a reply to earlier comment. Please remove this and my comment directly above. Sorry for newb error 🙂

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.