Observers have branded a Daily Mail journalist a “hoofwanking bunglecunt”, among other things, after seeing him mock Mhairi Black’s accent.
Black gave a speech in parliament on 7 March during a debate on whether misogyny should be classified as a hate crime. The Scottish National Party (SNP) MP received high praise for her contribution to the debate, where she detailed the misogynistic abuse she receives on a regular basis.
There was, however, one person who greeted Black’s honesty with less than praise: the Daily Mail‘s Quentin Letts. The tabloid’s columnist claimed he’d been present during the debate. But he said Black’s speech was difficult to understand for one particular reason:
Went to the 'ban wolf-whistling' debate just now. Few there. Mhairi Black (SNP) gave a speech full of rude words but I'm not sure anyone fully understood them. It's not an easy accent.
— Quentin Letts (@thequentinletts) March 7, 2018
Read on...Support us and go ad-free
It was clear by the way Letts began his tweet that he wasn’t about to launch into a glowing review of Black’s contribution. He called the parliamentary session a “ban wolf-whistling” debate. But the debate was about much more than wolf-whistling, including protecting children from sexual name-calling and harassment. It appears that Letts just saw it, however, as an attempt to criminalise “the hello-darlin’ pavement ogling that can occur outside pubs on balmy evenings”.
Letts then accused Black of giving a speech “full of rude words”. But Black was only relaying foul language used about her by others. This is a fact Letts ‘forgot’ to mention. He did, though, remember to claim that Black was incomprehensible because of her ‘not easy’ accent.
This is the same journalist who studied at Trinity College, Dublin. What a puzzling time that must have been for him.
Letts’s attack on Black’s accent (going for her vagina was clearly a no-no under the circumstances) did spark a debate of its own, though. One was about his professionalism and potential motives:
Mind, would you not be better addressing the substantive of her speech, rather than dismissing her accent?
— Left Peggers (@LeftPeggers) March 7, 2018
You mean the ‘profanity’ she was quoting? The ‘profanity’ directed at her? Oh, that ‘profanity’.
— JOANNE CAREY (@joannescarey) March 7, 2018
I thought the UK was slowly becoming better than judging people based on a lack of BBC accent. Her accent isn't even hard to understand, you're just being condescending for the sake of it.
— Kaz Carr (@ms_articulate) March 7, 2018
Plus, it also gave people the chance to shower Letts in some profanities of their own:
He must have an A+++ in Patronising Gitness…
— Left Peggers (@LeftPeggers) March 7, 2018
No condemnation of the people who used those words TO her however. But lets laugh at her accent. You really are an ass-hat.
— Mrs McMarple (@MrsMcMarple) March 7, 2018
Here’s another two, you hoofwanking bunglecunt 👍🏻
— Bripod (@Bripod1983) March 7, 2018
And as SNP engagement strategist Ross Colquhoun pointed out, Letts appears to be in the minority of people who don’t understand, or appreciate, Black’s speeches:
Mhairi Black has gone viral globally. Quentin Letts, not so much. https://t.co/2tjO0raEKi
— Ross Colquhoun (@rosscolquhoun) March 7, 2018
So all Letts managed to achieve with his cynical tweet was to prove Black right. “Misogyny is everywhere in our society”, as Black said, and it comes in many forms. And there’s no better time to call out such patronising and unwelcome attitudes than on International Women’s Day.
– Join The Canary if you appreciate the work we do.
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?