Even Guardian writers think the paper’s latest decision is one step too far

Jones Monbiot Guardian
Ed Sykes

The Guardian‘s latest advertising decision has sparked anger from readers. And even some Guardian writers think it was one step too far.

How low can you go?

Media outlets today usually rely on advertising revenue to stay afloat. And for online outlets, it’s difficult to control what adverts pop up. For print outlets, though, there’s little excuse for actually choosing to publish a controversial advert.

But just how low are outlets willing to go to get advertising money?

As The Canary reported on 7 March, a Saudi Arabian propaganda campaign emerged across London just as crown prince Mohammed bin Salman visited the city. And The Times and other billionaire-owned media outlets unsurprisingly supported these adverts, which suggested that bin Salman was “bringing change” to the country.

Many Guardian readers, however, expected better from an outlet that has often reported on Saudi Arabia’s poor human rights record and alleged war crimes in Yemen. And they were very disappointed to discover that the paper had also printed the Saudi propaganda:

A Guardian News & Media spokesperson told The Canary:

The acceptance of advertising and sponsorship in no way affects our editorial position. We are free to, and often do, challenge the activities of companies and organisations that are also our advertisers and sponsors.

But Guardian writers are not happy

When asked on Twitter, Guardian writers George Monbiot and Owen Jones both expressed their concern over the Saudi adverts:

Fortunately, human rights charity Reprieve did readers the favour of correcting Saudi Arabia’s propaganda:

According to the United Nations, at least 10,000 people have been killed during Saudi Arabia’s war on Yemen and three million people have been displaced. And as Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT) points out:

The Saudi bombing has struck schools and hospitals, and decimated vast residential areas… 80% of the population now require urgent aid, and a child is dying every 10 minutes from preventable diseases.

What’s happening to The Guardian?

If this were the first time The Guardian had given a platform to an unsavoury authoritarian regime, readers might forgive the temporary loss of moral fibre. But as The Canary previously reported, the paper also published a piece from Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan back in 2017, allowing the alleged war criminal to spew his propaganda all over Guardian readers. An editorial, meanwhile, called the re-emergence of alleged war criminal George W Bush “a welcome return”. And all of this happened as the paper whitewashed Theresa May’s past and became a bastion of Jeremy Corbyn-bashing.

It’s no wonder that even some Guardian writers are becoming concerned.

Get Involved!

– Support the Stop the War coalition, CAATPPU, the Arab Organisation of Human RightsGlobal Justice Now, and all the groups opposing Saudi Arabia’s state visit to the UK.

– Complain to your MP about Britain’s cosy relationship with Saudi Arabia. Also tell The Guardian how you feel about it giving a platform to alleged war criminals: guardian.readers[at]theguardian.com.

– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account. Also read and support other independent media outlets:

Another Angry VoiceMedia DiversifiedNovara MediaCorporate WatchRed PepperNew InternationalistCommon SpaceMedia LensBella CaledoniaVox PoliticalEvolve PoliticsReal MediaReel NewsSTRIKE! magazineThe Bristol CableThe Meteor, The SkwawkboxSalford StarThe Ferret.

Featured image via Rwendland/WikimediaJK the Unwise/WikimediaAsvensson/Wikimedia

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed