Cameron’s boasts backfire at PMQs, as Corbyn busts the myth of his “strong economy”

Support us and go ad-free

David Cameron’s weekly boasts about his “strong economy” took a worrying turn for the Prime Minister at Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) on 9 March. In his first question of the day, Corbyn quipped:

Last week the PM told the house that we have a strong economy with a sound plan. If the economy is so strong, then why this week has he forced through a £30 per week cut hitting some of the poorest disabled people in the country?

Here we see the crisis at the heart of Cameron’s rhetoric. At PMQs last week, Cameron responded to 4 out of the 6 questions Corbyn asked him with generalities about his “strong economy”.

Yet if our economy is really that strong, we wouldn’t have to cut Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) by £30 per week. These cuts will affect people who are too sick and disabled to work at present, through no fault of their own. A coalition of 60 charities – the Disability Benefits Consortium – condemned the cuts. They also surveyed disabled people and found that 69% believed the cuts would mean their health would suffer.

Cameron is stuck at a crossroads here. His argument must take one of two routes:

1) The economy isn’t actually very strong, and we therefore need to cut support for the most vulnerable people.

2) The economy is strong, and the cuts are just ideological.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

This was the Prime Minister’s answer:

He asked about the strength of the economy. We do face an uncertain international environment. And all the experts are warning about the dangers we face. But as we speak today, we have inflation at 0%, we have unemployment at 5%, our economy is growing, wages are growing, and we’re cutting the taxes that people are paying. That combined with reforming welfare- and we are reforming welfare, is the way to get our deficit down, continue with growth and help deliver for working people in Britain.

Here Cameron tries to step both ways. He claims we still need cuts for deficit reduction but, after six years of cuts, the deficit has increased dramatically under Tory rule. In fact, the current Conservative regime has piled on more debt than every post-war Labour government combined.

Austerity clearly isn’t working. And with the Tories spending more on bureaucracy (carrying out Work Capability Assessments) than they are saving in welfare expenditure, one can see exactly how the debt is piling up.

The cuts, or “reforms”, must therefore be ideological. As they’re costing the taxpayer even more than they save, it makes absolutely no sense to carry them out to reduce the deficit.

Do we really have a strong economy?

Well the deficit has risen to over 80% of GDP. So on the Tories’ own terms, they’re failing on what constitutes a “strong economy”.

How about inflation? In his answer, Cameron pretends having inflation at 0% is a good thing, but really a healthy economy has an inflation level of 2%. This is to avoid ‘deflation’, which can be catastrophic for the economy.

How about wage rises? Well the Conservatives imposed a “miserly” 1% pay rise on public sector workers this week, while over the last year MPs have enjoyed a whopping 11.3% wage increase. And under the Tories, we’ve seen the biggest fall in living standards since the second world war. This means wages have dragged way behind inflation.

How about preventing another financial crash? Cameron tries to shift the blame to external “dangers we face”. But it’s the Tories who learned nothing from the 2008 crash. They just exploited the crisis for political capital by blaming the Labour government. Osborne attacked Labour on the BBC in 2012, saying Labour rule had seen:

a complete failure to regulate those banks that led to the crisis.

This is true. But this was all supported by the Conservative Party at the time, and exacerbated by them since.

There was endless anti-regulatory rhetoric from Osborne when Labour were in power, such as this:

I fear that much of this regulation has been burdensome, complex and makes cross-border market penetration more difficult.

The Conservatives now blame “an uncertain international environment” because they’re the ones in government. But the truth is that Osborne has simply failed to reign in the financial sector. In fact, it appears he isn’t even trying:

  • He met with senior bankers five times between the 2015 election and December 2015, including the boss of Wall Street giant JP Morgan. This firm was fined £13bn for the part it played in causing the financial crisis.
  • He sacked the head of the Financial Services Authority (FSA), who bankers perceived as “tough”.
  • He watered down a new legal responsibility regime for senior bankers which would deter activity that leads to a crisis. This means senior bankers will be less accountable if things go wrong, which is one of the reasons so few bankers were subject to legal consequences after the last crash.
  • Now we have warnings from reports written for the Bank of England that Osborne may have triggered a financial crisis “greater than 2007”.

The Tories have maintained the same laissez-faire landscape that was the precursor to the 2008 financial crash. They have also failed to get down the deficit on their own terms. To top it off, wages have fallen way behind inflation, leading to a drastic fall in living standards.

These are bullet holes in Cameron’s “strong economy”.

But an economy in tatters is not a mandate for more austerity. Not when austerity has abjectly failed to get the nation’s finances in order for the past six years. We’re thus left with the conclusion that Cameron has not only overseen a terrible economic recovery, but that his austerity cuts are ideological and counterproductive.

You can watch PMQs in full here:

Get involved!

– Keep writing to your MP to express any discontent.

– If that’s not enough, you can pledge to take direct action.

Support The Canary so we can keep holding the government to account.

Featured image via Youtube screenshots.

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed