There were chaotic scenes outside Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) on Wednesday 18 April. Not that the mainstream media bothered to report it.
A “human catastrophe”
Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC) is at the forefront of the disability rights movement in the UK. As well as high-profile protests, legal actions, and campaigns, the group was also instrumental in securing a report from the UN. The report accused successive Conservative-led governments of “grave” and “systematic” violations of disabled people’s human rights, creating a “human catastrophe”.
But now, the group has turned its attention to Universal Credit, the new welfare payment from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). It had organised a day of action on 18 April, and it brought its grave concerns right to the heart of parliament in the middle of PMQs.
Chaos outside PMQs
DPAC activists began by occupying the central lobby in parliament just before midday. They set up a crime scene to highlight what they call the ‘crimes against claimants’ under Universal Credit. The new benefit has been linked to 160,000 more children losing free school meals. Also, the Trussell Trust says it’s seen increased food bank use in areas where Universal Credit has been rolled out:
Disabled people tried to “storm” parliament. So, a heavy police presence ensued, with DPAC members facing them down:
Activists accused the police of ‘heavy-handedness’ inside parliament. The protest then moved outside, with conscious rapper and poet Potent Whisper performing for the crowds:
DPAC and its supporters then moved down to Westminster station junction:
Around 80 people blocked the road, stopping traffic in all directions:
The crime scene was recreated:
Chants of “Benefits not bombs!” “Stop and scrap Universal Credit” and “Whose streets? Our streets!” were ringing out against the backdrop of parliament:
The only MPs that came out to support DPAC were Labour’s Debbie Abrahams and Laura Pidcock. After around an hour, police starting threatening disabled people with arrest if they did not move:
Police even threatened a squirrel with arrest:
— NO ONE (@depresseddawg74) April 18, 2018
But protesters continued blocking the road until about 2pm:
Protests were also happening up and down the country at the same time:
#StopAndScrapUniversalCredit #UniversalCredit #StopandScrap #No2childRule #NoEvictionsForUCrentArrears #Sheffieldissuper #Sheffield #ImWithDPAC thank you to everyone who came today " I #Believe that we will win" @Dis_PPL_Protest @paulapeters2 @LindaBurnip @AnitaBellows12 pic.twitter.com/ezVloQpfFF
— DPAC Sheffield (@DPACSheffield) April 18, 2018
— Social Action (@socialactioninf) April 18, 2018
— The LDVN (@TheLDVN) April 18, 2018
— York Defend Our NHS (@YorkDefendNHS) April 18, 2018
Universal Credit: overarching concerns
- Up to 1 million low-paid workers being subject to the same welfare and sanctions regime that disabled people have been living with.
- Universal Credit being administered wholly online, when around 2.9 million disabled people (22%) have never used the internet.
- An increase in the sanctions regime, linked to the Health and Work Conversations.
- Some disabled people and couples losing up to £5,195 a year due to changes to entitlements.
- The effect of the benefit on people living with mental health issues – specifically possible forced therapy.
Enough is enough
The DWP previously told The Canary:
We are committed to supporting people into work while making sure the right care is in place for those that can’t.
But the evidence on Universal Credit doesn’t hold weight with the DWP’s argument.
Despite DPAC’s and others’ concerns, the government has barely made any concessions on Universal Credit. So it’s once again down to disabled people to hold this government to account. And on 18 April, they did so in a brave and uncompromising way.
– Read The Canary‘s full analysis of Universal Credit.
Featured image via BBC Daily Politics – BBC iPlayer
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?