The government, however, just destroyed its own ‘moral’ case for war. Because it celebrated the 70th anniversary of the world’s milestone human rights declaration by visiting Israel – a country which is itself responsible for numerous despicable attacks on innocent people.
So much for the UK’s moral authority.
On the 70th Anniversary of the UN Declaration on Human Rights, the UK’s ‘Human Rights Minister’ (don’t laugh) is actually in… Israel. Where he hopes to “discuss cooperation”.
If the UK had a functioning news system, the state might crumble within 48 hours pic.twitter.com/mCuNlSaB4m
— Mark Curtis (@markcurtis30) April 11, 2018
The UN General Assembly adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948, following WWII. It’s essentially a promise from abiding nations to learn from history. It’s a vow to afford people the sort of rights that the Nazis denied to Jewish people and others.
Israel, however, doesn’t grant many of the declaration’s rights to Palestinians. During its 50-year-long occupation of Palestine, Israel has routinely denied people there the right to life, liberty, dignity and free movement. Its recent decision to use lethal force against unarmed protesters in Gaza, killing at least 30 people and wounding thousands of others, is just one example of this.
Nonetheless, foreign office minister Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon chose to spend the 70-year anniversary of the declaration in Israel discussing “cooperation” with the country. Ahmad, who describes himself as the government’s minister for human rights, says he also visited the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPTs):
Constructive meeting with Palestinian Prime Minister Hamdallah to discuss #humanrights in the #OPTs, including UK support for gender equality and freedom of expression, and #Gaza pic.twitter.com/E5EP4aPJjg
— Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon (@tariqahmadbt) April 11, 2018
Ahmad says he expressed UK support for “freedom of expression” while visiting Palestinian officials.
Perhaps he should raise that with the Israeli government too. Because it’s the one shooting Gazans in public when they turn out to protest.
But as Ahmad marked a human rights anniversary by discussing “cooperation” with a human rights violator, his fellow Conservative Johnny Mercer called for a “blitz” in Syria. The Plymouth MP wrote a column in The Sun about the awful images reportedly coming out of Douma, where the alleged chemical attack happened.
Mercer was unequivocal: innocent civilians have died, including children, so the UK must do something.
It didn’t take long, however, for people to point out how selective Mercer was in his outrage:
— Тheresa. D🌹🇪🇺💚🇵🇸 🏳️🌈 (@TJDunningham) April 9, 2018
UK bombs & UK planes & UK advisers & UK political support are key enablers, as we speak, of a devastating Saudi-led war on Yemeni civilians, producing the world's worst humanitarian crisis according to the UN. The sheer hypocrisy of Mercer's posturing is beyond breathtaking.
— Hicham Yezza (@HichamYezza) April 11, 2018
Mercer’s “posturing” is indeed “breathtaking”. Because his government has done sweet FA to punish Saudi Arabia for bombing the Yemenis to bits, nor has it attacked Burma for its genocide against the Rohingya people. And there’s no UK comeuppance coming to Israel over its brutal treatment of the Palestinians. The ‘human rights’ minister’s visit has certainly made that clear.
Mercer isn’t the only politician or commentator baying for justice either. The UK now has plenty of war cries like his. But nobody has carried out an investigation into the attack in Syria yet. So until an investigation proves who’s guilty, justice cannot be truly served.
And justice is, of course, meant to be blind. We’re meant to apply it to all people, equally. So it’s really difficult to believe that Mercer and his government believe in it at all when they’re so blatantly selective about who deserves it.
– Join The Canary if you appreciate the work we do.
– Take action with the Stop the War Coalition.
Featured image via screengrab
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?