In one fell swoop, the UK government destroys its own ‘moral’ case for war in Syria

Theresa May in parliament
Tracy Keeling

The UK is now potentially on the precipice of further bombing in Syria, because the governing party apparently feels a moral obligation to take action after an alleged chemical attack there.

The government, however, just destroyed its own ‘moral’ case for war. Because it celebrated the 70th anniversary of the world’s milestone human rights declaration by visiting Israel – a country which is itself responsible for numerous despicable attacks on innocent people.

So much for the UK’s moral authority.

Start your day with The Canary News Digest

Fresh and fearless; get excellent independent journalism from The Canary, delivered straight to your inbox every morning.

Let’s celebrate

The UN General Assembly adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948, following WWII. It’s essentially a promise from abiding nations to learn from history. It’s a vow to afford people the sort of rights that the Nazis denied to Jewish people and others.

Israel, however, doesn’t grant many of the declaration’s rights to Palestinians. During its 50-year-long occupation of Palestine, Israel has routinely denied people there the right to life, liberty, dignity and free movement. Its recent decision to use lethal force against unarmed protesters in Gaza, killing at least 30 people and wounding thousands of others, is just one example of this.

Nonetheless, foreign office minister Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon chose to spend the 70-year anniversary of the declaration in Israel discussing “cooperation” with the country. Ahmad, who describes himself as the government’s minister for human rights, says he also visited the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPTs):

Ahmad says he expressed UK support for “freedom of expression” while visiting Palestinian officials.

Perhaps he should raise that with the Israeli government too. Because it’s the one shooting Gazans in public when they turn out to protest.

Let’s bomb

But as Ahmad marked a human rights anniversary by discussing “cooperation” with a human rights violator, his fellow Conservative Johnny Mercer called for a “blitz” in Syria. The Plymouth MP wrote a column in The Sun about the awful images reportedly coming out of Douma, where the alleged chemical attack happened.

Mercer was unequivocal: innocent civilians have died, including children, so the UK must do something.

It didn’t take long, however, for people to point out how selective Mercer was in his outrage:

Mercer’s “posturing” is indeed “breathtaking”. Because his government has done sweet FA to punish Saudi Arabia for bombing the Yemenis to bits, nor has it attacked Burma for its genocide against the Rohingya people. And there’s no UK comeuppance coming to Israel over its brutal treatment of the Palestinians. The ‘human rights’ minister’s visit has certainly made that clear.

Blind justice?

Mercer isn’t the only politician or commentator baying for justice either. The UK now has plenty of war cries like his. But nobody has carried out an investigation into the attack in Syria yet. So until an investigation proves who’s guilty, justice cannot be truly served.

And justice is, of course, meant to be blind. We’re meant to apply it to all people, equally. So it’s really difficult to believe that Mercer and his government believe in it at all when they’re so blatantly selective about who deserves it.

Get Involved!

Join The Canary if you appreciate the work we do.

Take action with the Stop the War Coalition.

Featured image via screengrab

Since you're here ...

We know you don't need a lecture. You wouldn't be here if you didn't care.
Now, more than ever, we need your help to challenge the rightwing press and hold power to account. Please help us survive and thrive.

The Canary Support

Comments are closed