Bernie Sanders is in pole position with Nevada win. But the establishment push-back will now begin in earnest.
Bernie Sanders has just solidified his status as the front-runner in the contest to choose who will face Donald Trump in the presidential elections later this year. Though these are exciting times, there’s also a rocky road ahead. Because the establishment campaign to discredit him in every way possible will now begin in earnest.
Third democratic victory in a row
On 22 February, Sanders won the state of Nevada in the Democratic presidential primary race – the party’s internal candidate selection process. Sanders sailed to an easy victory with over 95% of results in at the time of publishing. Centrist rival Joe Biden, who was vice president during the Obama presidency, trailed far behind in second place with just over 20% of delegates.
Following his win in the New Hampshire primary and his close second place in the befuddled Iowa caucus – in which he actually won the most votes – Sanders is now undoubtedly in pole position. And that can mean only one thing – powerful interests who stand to lose from a Sanders presidency will now go into overdrive in their attempts to discredit him.
Good reasons to be scared
They’re right to be scared. Whereas Trump ran a phony campaign in 2016 claiming he would ‘drain the swamp’ only to kowtow to the usual corporate and military interests once in office, Sanders represents a genuine threat to the status quo. His pledge to introduce publicly provided universal healthcare, for example, would decimate the US’s private health insurance companies. CEOs and shareholders of these companies make millions every year from the profiteering that the current US healthcare model encourages.
Likewise, Sanders’ pledge to oppose needless war represents a huge threat to the powerful corporations that make up the military-industrial complex. These private entities have a vested interest in the US continuing its wars and occupations around the world since more war and occupation means more profits for them. And so they (rightly) fear that, as president, Sanders would impose a moratorium on new military operations and shut down the hundreds of military bases that the US has on foreign soil.
Antisemitism smear campaign 2.0
The smear campaign that will soon be launched against Sanders will be modeled in large part on that leveled against Jeremy Corbyn in the UK. Political scientist Norman Finkelstein described the latter as “basically a dress rehearsal for what’s going to happen here [in the US against Bernie Sanders]”.
Of course, smearing Sanders as an anti-Semite won’t be possible because he himself is Jewish. However, as Finkelstein explains, “he is surrounded by a lot of people on whom that charge will stick”. This includes people in his campaign staff who have been vocal in their support for Palestinian rights. It also includes members of the so-called ‘Squad’ – a group of progressive women members of congress who also have a strong record on speaking out on Palestinian issues and who, naturally, have endorsed Sanders. Amongst them are the first Muslim women ever elected to congress – Palestinian-American Rashida Tlaib and Somali-American Ilhan Omar.
Read on...
The limits of the Corbyn comparison
Though these are certainly legitimate concerns, there are also limits to this comparison. For one thing, because of the US’s presidential political system, any potential smear campaign is more limited in time. Whereas Corbyn had to put up with it for almost the entire five years that he was party leader, for Sanders, it will only last for the time remaining between now and the presidential election in November.
Second of all, the Democratic Party has not instigated a process of purges based on bogus accusations of antisemitism. As Finkelstein put it: “The Labour Party in the midst of this hysteria… has turned into a thought police… That’s unthinkable here [in the US]. Has anybody suggested that Ilan Omar should be expelled from the Democratic Party?”
And most crucially, Bernie Sanders has proven himself to be both more adept at countering attacks from right-wing forces and more steadfast in rejecting them for the nonsense they are. Whereas Corbyn suffered from his intrinsic niceness, as a tough, straight-talking New Yorker, Sanders will likely prove more willing to stand his ground.
And that means he could eventually triumph against Trump this November.
Featured image via Flickr – Gage Skidmore
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
-
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
A few plusses in the US system to note: 1) Unlike the autocratic, antiquated British political system, people don’t get ” expelled” from political parties for speech or policy postures. No one can really do that to them, I don’t think. I have never seen it in my 45+ years of living there 2) The members of the US Congress ARE the gov’t, unlike here where parliamentary MPs are mostly a cheerleading outfit. They can say and vote anyway they want on any issue and nobody can sanction them. Sure, they may not get any fiscal support from corporate donors for reelection, but if not intending to run for another term, they have no fears.
Bernie’s right to criticize those whose blood-money comes from killing foreigners. If the US does start war against Russia, China and Iran, the other side could change the nature of warfare forever by targeting their new missiles not just at western politicians and generals, but at the CEOs of these blood-money corporations. Take war to their front door; make sure they’re amongst the first to die in this one.
Once a few dozen have been splattered across their porch, or their lakeside cabins, or sunk aboard their yachts etc, the rest will soon call for a ceasefire. And they won’t be so keen to start any other war.