Labour leadership candidates have received a request to support ten pledges from the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) – “the UK’s largest Muslim umbrella body”. And considering the controversy that similar pledges from the Board of Deputies of British Jews (BoD) have sparked in recent days, the BoD could learn a lot from the MCB about how to make reasonable, respectful, and inclusive requests.
We welcome @LabourMuslims support for our 10 key pledges which highlight a range of concerns and priorities for British Muslims. We encourage the @UKLabour leadership hopefuls, and indeed all party leaders, to support Muslim communities by adopting these policies. https://t.co/7ManrxZGWF
— MCB (@MuslimCouncil) January 15, 2020
Read on...Support us and go ad-free
The big difference between the MCB and BoD pledges
Jewish left-wingers have expressed serious concerns about the BoD pledges, which Labour leadership candidates have all backed. As The Canary reported on 14 January, there are worries in particular that the BoD is asking Labour to “disregard the views of Jews with whom [the leaders of the BoD] disagree”. Jewish critics have also accused the BoD of seeking to undermine the party’s independence.
All of the Board of Deputies' pledges are at best questionable, mostly wrong and two are potentially illegal. I don't know who produced this critique but it shows all the Labour leadership contenders to be utterly useless In combating racism & antisemitism. pic.twitter.com/FeomRXrvXF
— Jews Sans Frontieres (@jewssf) January 13, 2020
The BoD says, for example, that:
Labour must engage with the Jewish community via its main representative groups, and not through fringe organisations and individuals.
This is in stark contrast to the MCB, which asks Labour to:
Commit to proactively engage with a broad and representative spectrum of British Muslim communities to ensure a plurality of views are being considered.
The difference between the two groups’ approaches is clear. While the former seeks to exclude voices it disapproves of, the latter actively encourages inclusivity.
Another difference is that the BoD appeared to target only Labour (a committed anti-racist party), without demanding the backing of Conservative leader Boris Johnson or any other party leader. The MCB, meanwhile, called on “all party leaders” to adopt its pledges.
The BoD’s stance is particularly concerning considering that Johnson – who’s very popular among fascists – has a longstanding record of insulting women, ethnic minority groups, religious minority groups, the LGBTQIA+ community, and working-class people. He and his party, meanwhile, have long faced allegations of antisemitism, with ties to antisemitic, far-right parties in Europe being a particular cause for concern. They are also experiencing an Islamophobia crisis which seems to be out of control. Statistics have previously shown, for example, that 56% of Conservative Party members believe “Islam is a threat to the British way of life”.
BoD pledges sparking controversy
On 13 January, a Labour branch passed a motion criticising the BoD pledges:
Here is the perfectly reasonable resolution that @AlexcHolmes is misrepresenting. https://t.co/MU1TFhyiZM. If you can't or won't follow the link, the pic is of the entire innocuous resolution is here https://t.co/TYOOVa2jhH pic.twitter.com/a4GADGqEIE
— Jews Sans Frontieres (@jewssf) January 14, 2020
Alex Holmes, vice-chair of the Ilford South branch, claimed there were antisemitic comments at this local meeting. Ilford South MP Sam Tarry responded by tweeting:
1) I always take any allegation of racism extremely seriously. I’ve been speaking to members this morning who were in attendance at the local ward branch meeting last night, including the two Jewish members who proposed the motion. https://t.co/ubnKsI18k2
— Sam Tarry (@SamTarry) January 14, 2020
He said “there are conflicting accounts” about what attendees had said. But he added that there would be “zero tolerance” if Labour upheld any of the allegations.
Keep Labour independent
Labour must listen to all communities across the UK, while also retaining its political independence. The MCB pledges respect that. The BoD pledges don’t. That’s why the latter have caused so much anger among party members. The BoD should take a leaf out of the MCB’s book.Support us and go ad-free
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.