During a speech at an Edinburgh event, former BBC journalist Emily Maitlis accused her old employer of bias. She also referred to a BBC board member as the Conservative Party’s “active agent”. That board member was subsequently named in the media as Robbie Gibb.
None of this is new, though: The Canary and other media have been publishing similar accusations about Gibb’s role at the BBC – and much more – for some years.
‘Arbiter of impartiality’
Maitlis’ speech, which starts 10 minutes in, is here in full:
A complete transcript is here.
In an extract from her speech Maitlis referred to the BBC board:
where another active agent of the Conservative Party – a former Downing Street spin doctor and former advisor to BBC rival GB News – now sits acting as the arbiter of BBC impartiality.
Journalist Emily Maitlis has hit out at the BBC – her former employer – claiming its board has been infiltrated by a Conservative Party agent and former Downing Street spin doctor whom she claims is now an 'arbiter of BBC impartiality'.
— Sky News (@SkyNews) August 24, 2022
Who is the “active agent”?
So who is this “active agent”?
Gibb is the brother of Tory MP Nick Gibb, who held the post of schools minister.
Robbie Gibb worked for the BBC for some 25 years. During that time he headed BBC Westminster; was editor of The Daily Politics and This Week, and was deputy editor of Newsnight.
In April 2021, the BBC announced that Gibb had been appointed to its board. It mentioned, too, another senior appointment:
Richard Sharp replaced Sir David Clementi as the BBC’s chairman. Sharp, a former banker, investor and philanthropist, is close to Rishi Sunak, the Chancellor, who he worked with during the pandemic. Sunak previously worked with Sharp at Goldman Sachs.
One tweeter has called for a ban on anyone with a political background running the BBC:
Well said. I don't personally have any animosity towards journalists on the front line. It's management & editorial where there *is* a problem. There should be a ban on anyone with a political history running the BBC. No party donors, former party candidates & no No.10 advisers. pic.twitter.com/S4KJzTbHX4
— Stephen🔶🐟🇺🇦🇪🇺#StandWithUkraine #GetPRDone (@TheStephenRalph) August 25, 2022
Courting the far right
One example we covered was about how Gibb allegedly failed to run a story about Arron Banks’ Leave.EU and its ‘courting’ of the far-right while at the BBC:
https://t.co/pbNTdJCphb actively courted far right fascists during the referendum campaign. The BBC and Robbie Gibb have serious questions to answer over their failure to run this story in 2016. The truth is ugly but it must be exposed. https://t.co/MvdwYfo6MG
— David Lammy (@DavidLammy) April 18, 2019
The story was aired as part of a Channel 4 News investigation. That investigation claimed to have seen leaked emails revealing how Banks “repeatedly lied to cover-up his Brexit campaign’s effort to attract far-right extremists”.
The Canary reported how extremists were alleged to have included supporters of known far-right groups, including “the National Front, the BNP, Britain First and the EDL”.
And, according to Channel 4 News:
Banks emailed another Leave.EU director, saying: “I don’t think they will Run it after all that lot . You will have a busy week next week since Robbie will react by giving us massive exposure.
The “crouch position”
The Canary revealed another example of Brexit bias. This was when it was shown that the BBC was guilty of ‘using bias by omission’ by editing a headline to downplay the part Brexit played in the bin lorry drivers shortage.
In her speech Maitlis was quite candid about how the BBC feared going against the Conservative government’s Brexit stance, saying that:
sections of both the BBC and government-supporting newspapers appear to go into an automatic crouch position whenever the Brexit issue looms large…
in case they get labelled pessimistic, anti-populist, or worse still, as above: unpatriotic.
The Canary also noted that Gibb was in charge of the corporation’s live political shows during the EU referendum. We reported, too, how Tory MP Nick Boles accused Gibb of being one of the key people urging May not to compromise on Brexit.
Then there was the accusation of antisemitism levelled at Jeremy Corbyn.
In April 2020, The Canary’s Ed Sykes reported on a consortium of individuals that purchased the anti-Corbyn and right-leaning Jewish Chronicle. The consortium included:
- John Ware, the man responsible for the highly controversial 2019 Panorama hit-job against Corbyn and his party.
- Former BBC editor and Tory adviser Robbie Gibb.
- Former Labour warhawk John Woodcock, whom Boris Johnson’s government has since employed (without a hint of irony) as “special envoy for countering violent extremism”.
- Israeli-state apologist Jonathan Sacerdoti, who was once a spokesperson for the highly controversial Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) and bragged in 2018 about “weaponising” antisemitism to get rid of Corbyn.
The infamous Panorama episode, referred to above, alleged antisemitism by Corbyn. However, The Canary revealed that out of the 10 people who came forward to provide ‘evidence’ against Corbyn, eight had leading roles in an anti-Corbyn organisation. It should be noted that the Jewish Chronicle has been successfully sued in recent years, on multiple times, for slandering socialists.
More details were provided via this tweet by The Canary’s James Wright:
— James Wright (@wrightismight) July 20, 2019
As for Gibb’s views on Corbyn, it’s no surprise he said that the Labour leader “opened the door to toxic extremism” for Labour.
More examples of bias
It’s not just all about Gibb, but the systemic problem of bias at the BBC.
Prior to the 2019 General Election The Canary‘s Emily Apple reported more examples of BBC bias:
- Broadcasting the wrong footage of Boris Johnson on Remembrance Sunday.
- Deciding to make ‘not politicising’ the NHS its top story.
- Broadcasting Jeremy Corbyn’s interview with Andrew Neil before Johnson agreed to do a similar interview. Something Johnson refused to do throughout the campaign.
- Its political editor Laura Kuenssberg using her Twitter account with millions of followers to promote Johnson on numerous occasions. But perhaps her lowest point was tweeting the lie, fed to her from Tories, that Matt Hancock’s aide had been punched by a protester.
- Editing out the audience laughing at Johnson during a leadership debate in one of its lunchtime news bulletins.
- On the eve of the election, it was accused of electoral fraud after Kuenssberg broadcast comments about the number of postal votes looking “grim” for Labour.
In another case The Canary revealed how the BBC ran with the government’s entirely false assertion that it had met its target of 100,000 Coronavirus (Covid-19) tests a day.
Pot calling kettle black
Maitlis should be applauded for her speech, though she herself is not without guilt.
One tweeter points out that Maitlis’ denouncement of BBC bias is from her new position in a “lucrative” new job:
Maitlis's credibility now as 'whistle blower' is more than a bit damaged by this.
It has taken her this long time (and a lucrative new job) to admit what we all knew was indefensible – but she was happy to see defended by the BBC.
— Roger Gall (@Shambles151) August 24, 2022
And another tweeter reminds us of the time she warned of putting Corbyn into power:
I’m really finding this Maitlis adoration quite pathetic. Remember this ? “You're going to fail the country on this one possibly & put Jeremy Corbyn in power”
— Mr Ethical (@nw_nicholas) August 24, 2022
Shining a light
While the BBC produces excellent drama and the occasional documentary, the idea that it’s impartial in its news coverage is a myth. Moreover, Gibb’s role in this bias has been known for years – Maitlis merely confirmed that the accusations are true.
We are in an age when the dissemination of disinformation (deliberately incorrect information), or misinformation (inadvertently incorrect information) is often difficult to spot. Fortunately, independent media continues to shine a light on such bias or fake news. Sadly, it’s a job that has no end.
Featured image via screenshot Edinburgh Television Festival/YouTube
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?